* 2008 & filmplus.org/frussia/anticom

anatoly.org
Когда писались эти страницы про коммунизм, не было ни интеренета, ни сетевых страниц, тем более, второго поколения -- семантических!

Конечно, было понятно, что коммунизм -- это социальные технологии, как теперь говорят. Даже мелкали мысли, мол, коммунистическая идея слишком передовая, не доросли еще человечки.

А теперь в самый раз, компьтеров большевикам не хватало. Теперь компьютеры везде, а пламенные коммунисты вымерли. Они больше не нужны, дожил, наконец, я до светлого будущего.

Как же оно выглядит, царство коммунизма?

...

Do you think it's strange to think about communism in 2008?

Think agian.

Should we re-read Beyrdyaev together?

No page for Berdyaev? Not even in bibliography?

Notes? Books?

And who else will write about Communism and the Third Millennium? Maybe, Fedorov?

Maybe, in Theology of Technology?

Maybe.


2005: antohins.vtheatre.net * russia.vtheatre.net *

TOPICS: drama + russian-american project + postmodern + time + space + past + present + future + death + woman + resurrection + family + generations +
Против "идеи" коммунизма... я не против. Да? Как же это так?
[ advertising space : webmaster ]

Так ты против чего стоишь?
Film-North

Virtual Theatre in Fairbanks

Sellassie U

I can only hope that with time it will be understood that I am against both -- the Soviet and the American communism. I saw them both. I hope that readers can see that my disliking of communism has nothing to do with my understanding that communism is our future. Ex-Soviets do return to the main stream of the (western) civilization and it's good. What is not good that is we didn't understand the universe they are coming from -- the Soviet Reality.

Enough is said and written about the horrors of Real Communism, not enough about the intentions of the inhibitants, the litlle people like me. The Evil Empire was built and ran by us.

If you will detect some sad intonations on the pages of Father-Russia, please, it's not a nostalgia; after all it was my life. Life of many. The only life we knew.

Communism Museum

Summary

Rozanov: "В революции никогда не будет сегодня ибо всякое завтра ее обманет и перейдет в послезавтра" ("Опавшие листья").

Questions

Anticommunism dominated American domestic politics in the late 1940s and 1950s, when it was transformed by the cold war from a right-wing to a mainstream ideology. It was composed of many strands, each with its own definition of the communist menace and its own formula for combating it. The American Communist party also had a hand in shaping the opposition it encountered. Although never a serious threat to the nation's security, the party's ideological submission to the Soviet Union and its penchant for clandestine activities seemingly justified the campaign against it. But the scope of that campaign went far beyond the needs of national security. Political conservatives took advantage of the party's association with a wide range of social reforms to mount an attack on the entire Left and on the legacy of the New Deal.
The social unrest that followed World War I coincided with the founding of the Communist party and precipitated the first wave of explicit anticommunism, the red scare of 1919-1920. This crackdown, like earlier outbreaks of political repression, focused on foreigners and labor unions. Immigration officials rounded up and tried to deport thousands of foreign-born radicals, and many employers used red-baiting to break strikes. The repression succeeded, and, during the 1920s, neither the American Communist party nor the rest of the Left had any significant influence.

Notes

But in the following decade, the onset of the Great Depression and the rise of Adolf Hitler spurred the party's growth. In accordance with an international Communist policy known as the Popular Front, the party tried to create a broad coalition against fascism. By muting its revolutionary rhetoric and supporting President Franklin D. Roosevelt and the New Deal, it attracted many middle-class idealists. Others joined the party to organize labor unions or stop Hitler. As a result, it was easy for right-wing opponents of the social changes of the 1930s to attack them as a Communist plot. But such charges had little impact. Many Americans, though never tempted to become Communists themselves, nonetheless tolerated the party.
filmplus
2004 & After

antohins
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

That toleration disappeared in 1939 when, as a result of the Nazi-Soviet pact, the Communist party opposed Roosevelt's foreign policy and the Popular Front disintegrated. Liberals, who until then had defended Communists against the Right, turned against the party themselves, transforming anticommunism into a more widespread enterprise. Labor unions, universities, private organizations, and governments at every level ousted Communists from their ranks. A broader purge would certainly have occurred had Hitler's invasion of Russia in June 1941 not changed the Soviet Union into an American ally.
Personal Politics Liberty is always unfinished business. --anonymous
The coming of the cold war resuscitated domestic anticommunism and made it central to American politics. Because of the Communist party's connection to the Soviet Union, it was now seen as a threat to national security. A consensus developed based on several key assumptions: that all Communists owed their primary loyalty to Moscow; that they unblinkingly followed the party line; and that they would, whenever possible, work to subvert the American system. There was just enough substance to these charges to make it possible for this otherwise unrealistic image of American Communism to gain currency and fuel the demand for its exposure and elimination.

Although the campaign against communism took place on every level, the most effective initiatives came from the federal government. In 1947, the Truman administration promulgated a loyalty-security program that barred Communists or people who associated with Communists from government jobs. At the same time, the Department of Justice brought criminal prosecutions to bear on the party. It tried to deport foreign-born Communists and, in 1948, indicted and convicted the party's top leaders under the Smith Act, a 1940 law prohibiting the "teaching and advocating" of subversive doctrines. Several hundred Communists went to jail. Congressional committees, especially the House Un-American Activities Committee (huac), investigated supposed Communist subversion throughout American society. The Supreme Court, despite the serious constitutional issues involved, placed few restrictions on the anticommunist campaign. This official activity legitimated a witch-hunt. Politicians, abetted by sympathetic journalists and other interested parties, used the charge of Communist infiltration to implement agendas that often bore little or no relation to national security.

As the anticommunist campaign spread, the civil liberties of many people were threatened. This occurred primarily because of the widespread belief that communism so endangered the nation's security that the rights of individuals, especially of those supposed to be Communists, could be ignored. The structure of the anticommunist campaign, with its two-stage procedure of first exposing and then punishing alleged subversives, diffused responsibility for the repression. Official authorities like huac and the fbi usually handled the first stage by identifying the tainted individuals, and employers usually handled the second by firing them.

The party's insistence on secrecy made the exposure of its members the central feature of the anticommunist crusade. Because Communists had been part of a larger political movement that encompassed an entire constellation of left-wing causes and organizations, investigators assumed that all participants in the larger movement belonged to the party as well. Reactionary and overzealous investigators expanded the definition of what constituted a communist activity until it came to include anything from appreciating the paintings of Pablo Picasso to speaking out for the Bill of Rights.

Anticommunism was used for partisan purposes as well. The Republican party sought to capitalize on a few cases of alleged Communist infiltration of the New Deal. Ambitious politicians like Joseph R. McCarthy asserted that the Democrats had been "soft" on communism and had "lost" China after the war. There was no truth in these charges, but they put the Democrats on the defensive and, especially after the Korean War broke out in June 1950, made them afraid to challenge the anticommunist crusade and the abuses that accompanied it.

By the late 1950s, the furor had subsided. Zealots and opportunists like McCarthy had given anticommunism a bad name. And it was clear that the enfeebled and internally divided Communist party was no threat to national security. But the crusade had taken a toll. Not only had thousands of people lost their jobs, but political dissent had almost disappeared—an ironic result at a time when the United States was combating communism throughout the world in the name of freedom and democracy.

David Caute, The Great Fear: The Anti-Communist Purge under Truman and Eisenhower (1978); Kenneth O'Reilly, Hoover and the Un-Americans (1983).
Ellen W. Schrecker

I hope you understand now why the book has another title -- Communism in America... I hope you understand why the title is "Post-AmeriKa"...

Russian Book 1975 - 2005: Lost Manuscript * Потерянная Жизнь
NonFiction

Коммунизм победил, но не осталось коммунистов с партилетами праздновать победу.

...


Theatre w/Anatoly Old HS WWW: Haile Sellassie Family Web Russian Page : Index Film-North * in Russian * list * appendix * links * contents * biblio ** My Nonfiction (webtexts): SELF * Theology of Technology * POV * PostAmeriKa * Father-Russia * Write * Mailing List & News -- subscribe yourself!

Anti-Communism Page

Why communism is good for you

or

Как мы пришли к Победе Коммунизма

sRussia

Жертвам коммунизма... с разрешения автора:

TO THE VICTIMS OF COMMUNISM, LEST WE FORGET

By Jeff Jacoby
The Boston Globe
December 7, 1995

In 1993, President Clinton signed Public Law 103-199, authorizing a memorial in Washington to those who died in the ``unprecedented imperial Communist holocaust'' that began in 1917. It is a memorial long overdue. And it is well-suited to Washington, the capital of the Free World and the headquarters of what President Kennedy called the ``long twilight struggle'' against the totalitarians of the Left. When completed, the Victims of Communism Memorial will include a museum documenting the crimes committed by the disciples of Marx and Lenin; original artifacts from the bitter night of Communist brutality (a piece of the Berlin Wall, a cell from the ``Hanoi Hilton''); and a database preserving the names of those wiped out in history's greatest slaughter.

Or at least as many of those names as can be identified. It is impossible that we shall ever know them all. Every one of the hundreds of thousands of Cossacks butchered on Lenin's orders in 1919? Every Miskito Indian killed in Nicaragua under the Sandinistas? Every Chinese peasant, all 2 million-plus of them, obliterated during Mao Zedong's ``land reform'' in the early 1950s? Impossible.

For pure murderous evil, there has never been a force to compare with Communism. The Nazis didn't come close. The Holocaust was uniquely malignant - never before or since did one people construct a vast industry of death for the sole purpose of rounding up and destroying every single member of another people. But the Nazis exterminated 11 million innocents; the Communist death toll surpasses 100 million. Nazi power lasted from 1933 to 1945. The Communist nightmare began in November 1917, and continues to this day.

Savagery has always been a hallmark of Communism. It is an ideology that requires the destruction of human beings. ``We have never rejected terror in principle,'' wrote Lenin in 1901, ``nor can we do so.''

Half a century later, even as he denounced the extremes to which his predecessors went, Nikita Khrushchev vowed that the terror so esteemed by Lenin would go on. ``The questioning of Stalin's terror,'' he cautioned the Twentieth Party Congress in 1956, ``may lead to the questioning of terror in general. But Bolshevism believes in the use of terror.'' Not long afterward, Khrushchev sent 3,000 Soviet tanks to crush the Hungarian freedom fighters.

Communism equals murder. Everywhere. Always.

In Ukraine, for example, where 7 million people were starved to death on the Kremlin's orders. ``If you go now to the Ukraine or the North Caucuses,'' wrote British journalist Malcolm Muggeridge in 1933, ``exceedingly beautiful countries and formerly amongst the most fertile in the world, you will find them like a desert; ... no livestock or horses; villages deserted; peasants famished, often their bodies swollen, unutterably wretched.'' Farmers who took grain or vegetables from their own land were shot. Dead bodies littered the streets of Kharkov, the capital. ``It was,'' an eyewitness later recalled, ``as if the Black Death had passed through.''

Communism equaled murder in Ethiopia, where Mengistu Haile Mariam became dictator in 1977 and embarked on what he called his ``Red Terror.'' Tens of thousands were massacred, including the graduating seniors of almost every high school in Addis Ababa.

Communism equaled murder in North Vietnam as far back as 1945, when Ho Chi Minh resolved to annihilate his Nationalist rivals. ``It was appalling,'' recorded the historian Lucien Bodard. ``Thousands, maybe tens of thousands of men had been liquidated .... The intention was that horror and dread should extinguish the last trace of respect for them among the masses: Their execution had to be both shameful and terrifying. That was the reason for the mass executions of hundreds at once, the fields of prisoners buried alive, the harrows dragged over men buried up to the neck.''

Communism equaled murder in Tibet, where Mao's campaign to extirpate Buddhist culture turned 1.2 million Tibetans into corpses. It equaled murder in gentle Cambodia, where the bloodlust of the Khmer Rouge vaporized one-third of the nation in less than four years. It equaled murder in Cuba, in East Germany, in Afghanistan. From Stettin in the Baltic to Trieste in the Adriatic - murder. In the Gulag and the laogai - murder. At Tienanmen Square - murder. In the Korean War and the Vietnam War, in the forest of Katyn and the dungeons of the Lubyanka - murder.

One hundred million victims of Communism. And those are only the victims who were slain. It doesn't include those who were maimed or driven mad. Those whose lives went dark when a loved one was butchered. Those who spun out their years in potato queues, in vodka stupors, in daily fear. It doesn't include those who wasted 30 years as slaves in Siberia. The boat people who flung themselves into the South China Sea. The stifled poets, the gagged priests, the tormented refuseniks, the exiled democrats.

Rarely do we think of them, or of the hundred million. We forget how pathologically evil Communism has been, or why we poured so much blood and treasure into fighting the Cold War. It is to correct that amnesia that the Victims of Communism Memorial will be built.

For information, contact:

VICTIMS OF COMMUNISM MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
P.O. Box 1997 Washington, DC 20013

202-785-0266 202-785-0261 (fax)

JEFF JACOBY IS A GLOBE COLUMNIST.

Toidze Anti-Communism Page @ Sellassie Cyber Museum. See who's visiting this page.
Google
 
Web vtheatre.net
filmplus.org
©2004 filmplus.org *
* home * about * guide * classes * advertise * faq * contact * news * forums * mailing list * bookstore * ebooks * search * calendar * games * polls * submit your link * web *
Korezky
  Словарь Яндекс.Лингво
 


  


War We Are In, Part Two: Communism vs. Capitalism

Public Domain

This film is part two of a television program of lectures given by Dr. George S. Benson, the president of Harding College in Searcy, Arkansas. In this program, he redefines the meaning of peace from the point of view of communism. Communists are promoting peace fronts to get Kennedy to eliminate atomic weapon power, since they are stronger in manpower. Peace to a Communist means eliminating capitalism and Communists will engage in this cold war until they can compete in a "hot war". Co-existence to a Communist means, "you leave me alone until I'm strong enough to knock your block off", which Dr. George S. Benson predicts they could compete with us in atomic power by the years 1970-1975. They will fight the cold war and fight capitalism by going undercover and gaining leadership over many non-communist organizations, by infiltrating employees and alienating them from their employers, and by concentrating on women's organizations and appealing to colored workers, appearing to be the party of the collective and the worker.

Пятнадцать лет (Новая) Россия строит "капитализм". И что?

В какие лет пять ухитрились переделить (опять) собственность. Кто был ничем, стал, действительно, всем. Миллиардеры. А что? Воплотилось -- "все вокруг народное, все вокруг мое!" -- всем, конечно, не досталось.

... И опять, в который раз, народ безмолствует.

Скорее всего, его и нет, народа, семьи. И не было?

...

bar.txt : история * СССР * Запад * РУ * anatoly.groups.live.com

2006. Перечитывать не хочется. Читать.

После стольких надежд на идею коммунизма, тупой откат. Не то, кажется, что именно эта идея и не была понята. Такое бывает, применение без понимания...

...

See who's visiting this page.

©2009 - 2006
RUSSIAN HISTORY amazon

Lijit Search
webmaster newrussian.org: "новый русский" + my russian yahoo & videopage
home: appendix * links * biblio * books * glossary * references * notes * list * new * русский дневник * father-russia * keywords * video * map * store * 2008 : my library books.google.com * my live.com/RU

End Notes : profile.to/anatoly + anatoly.groups.live.com